Amperzen Logo

Add to Technorati Favorites

Event Calendar

Gumshoe Review Logo

SFRevu Robot Logo

TechRevu Ad

Voting Reform — For When I rule the world

Checked off voting boxEvery now and then I think about what I would do IF I ruled the world. Today, I was thinking about voting reform for the US.

  1. Get rid of the electoral college. It was a great idea in the beginning because travel was difficult and communications weren’t as swift. But in today’s world of instant communication, where the votes are tallied and counted within hours of the closing of the poles there’s no need to have it — it’s another way that the will of the people can be changed by a group that really, in many states, isn’t even obligated to vote inline with the popular vote for that state. So, get rid of it. The vote is the vote and that’s that.
  2. Add two new categories to every slate of candidates. First, “None of the Above”. If “None of the Above” wins the office then none of the candidates who are running are allowed to run again for that office for at least 2 years. The office needs a new slate and another election. So, it costs a bit more to run a second election but finally the people might actually get a slate where they are not voting for the lesser of two evils but actually voting for someone. Second, “Don’t care”. This isn’t the same as “None of the Above” because it’s similar to leaving the ballot blank. What it provides is a measure of voter apathy. If “Don’t Care” wins, well, it’s an indication that this is a bad group running for office particularly if “None of the Above” comes in second.
  3. Count votes with the “Australian Run-Off System”. This method has a lot of different names but that’s the one I’m familiar with. Basically, voters rank the candidates as first choice, second choice, and so forth. You don’t have to rank them all you could just have a first choice pick. However, if the first choice doesn’t win by a specified margin then the candidate with the lowest number of votes is thrown out and the votes are recalculated so that all the ballots that had the disqualified person in 1st place, now have their 2nd place person become their 1st place person, and all the ballots are counted again. You can read here for a more detailed explanation as it’s used in the Hugo voting. This would allow 3rd party candidates to actually have a shot at winning. Right now 3rd party candidates really don’t have a chance as so many voters are trying to make sure that the greater evil doesn’t win and don’t want to split votes to get who they want because they have to make sure the evil one doesn’t win. With this system, if your first candidate is eliminated, you get to automatically try again with your second place candidate and your vote isn’t “wasted” by voting for someone that “can’t win”.
  4. Get rid of the proprietary and secret electronic voting machines. If we’re going to use electronic machines, then they should be open source. All the code should be available for anyone to inspect, and the certified code that is going to be used should be check-summed so that the polling places can verify that the certified code is, in fact, what’s being used. Furthermore, the raw vote counts should be made immediately available after the vote for review. Lastly, every voting machine should print out a record which is reviewed by the voter and then placed in a hopper for recounting purposes. A certain percentage of voting districts should be randomly selected and have recounts performed and compared to the electronic totals. Elections results in America should be the property of the American people and therefore be as open and transparent as it is possible to be.

That’s it for now. I really think that some of these should be instituted as a way to make sure the actual will of the people prevails, rather than the whole thing being to see that the lesser of several evils doesn’t win. I probably still won’t like the outcome but at least I’ll feel that every candidate had a fair shot at the office they wanted.

One Response to “Voting Reform — For When I rule the world”

  1. John Koza Says:

    The major shortcoming of the current system of electing the President arises from the winner-take-all rule (currently used by 48 of 50 states) under which all of a state’s electoral votes to the candidate who gets the most votes in the state. If the partisan divide in a state is not initially closer than about 46%-54%, no amount of campaigning during a brief presidential campaign is realistically going to reverse the outcome in the state. As a result, presidential candidates have no reason to poll, visit, advertise, organize, campaign, or worry about the concerns in voters of states where they are safely ahead or hopelessly behind. Instead, candidates concentrate their attention on a handful of closely divided “battleground” states. As a result, 88% of the money and visits (and attention) is focused on just 9 states. Fully 99% of the money goes to just 16 states. More than two-thirds of the country is left out.

    Another shortcoming of the current system is that a candidate can win the Presidency without winning the most popular votes nationwide.

    The National Popular Vote bill would guarantee the Presidency to the candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states (and DC). The bill would take effect only when enacted, in identical form, by states possessing a majority of the electoral votes—that is, enough electoral votes to elect a President (270 of 538). When the bill is enacted in a group of states possessing 270 or more electoral votes, all of the electoral votes from those states would be awarded, as a bloc, to the presidential candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states (and DC).

    The National Popular Vote bill has 366 legislative sponsors in 47 states. It has been signed into law in Maryland. Since its introduction in February 2006, the bill has passed by 12 legislative houses (one house in Colorado, Arkansas, New Jersey, and North Carolina, and two houses in Maryland, Illinois, Hawaii, and California).

    See http://www.NationalPopularVote.com